Guidelines for Community Participation

We want to create and in turn help others to facilitate safe, professional spaces for people to learn from each other. Towards that goal, we expect all awardees to follow guidelines for ethical relations as outlined in the Code for Science and Society's code of conduct. In addition, all awardees work with the event fund manager to develop their own appropriate event-specific guidelines for community participation. Awardees' guidelines for community participation may include the following components:

• Clear guidelines for reporting
• Clear language about how to file reports
• A review and appeal process
• A Transparency report (see pycon's example)

Example codes of conduct and community participation guidelines:

• Mozilla's community participation guidelines
• OpenCon's code of conduct
• Community Covenant's code of conduct for online communities
• Contributor Covenant's code of conduct
• The Carpentries code of conduct
• Buffer's code of conduct and its importance for diversity and inclusion
• Betterteam's code of ethics and professional conduct
• Society for the Social Studies of Science Event Ethics Policy

Resources for developing a code of conduct and responding to reports:

• Mozilla's guide to writing a code of conduct
• Frame Shift Consulting's guide to responding to code of conduct reports